<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Eiso Kant - Latest Comments in Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://eisokant.disqus.com/is_lasting_value_diluted_by_blogs_57/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:32:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-177730383</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thnx for sharing great post &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">RedSnow 0.9.6rc9</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 07:32:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-65439204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Excellent post.I want to thank you for this informative read, I really appreciate sharing this great post. Keep up your work.&lt;br&gt; ..., &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rjeka hotels</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-1009237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;p.s. A teenager who reads is also an oxymoron ;-); I seem to like them.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eiso Kant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:12:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-1009224</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's a mind-set we consciously need to step away from and start making decisions about what content is actually valuable to us. I recently ordered 8 new books; instead I could spend my time staying up-to-date on the Google-Digg deal. These days I am satisfied reading a summary at the end of the day.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eiso Kant</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:11:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-1009000</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you're onto something here.  I think Scoble is right about techie blogging.  And, parenthetically, techie blogging and newsflow is really a special interest ghetto -- a disproportionally large niche, since young, tech-oriented people dominate the fastest-moving traffic on the Internet.  There are too many blogs to even start to get around to, and as a result, like in all pop-tech, a few blogs dominate the influence.  I'm afraid that with the butterfly-attention-spanned young-tech audience, tiny blog-bursts will continue to dominate this in-the-moment medium.  Nobody in this group has time for essays, even mini ones.  ("mini-essay" is an oxymoron, anyway.)  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dave Newton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:29:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-1004399</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Gareth.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When you say "how many people are going to go back in a years time to re-read something that was only relevant for a brief period of time?" you touch exactly upon my point. There's content we write that is for the moment but there are also times where we write for a lifetime. Content that is still applicable in a year from now. I am trying to find a way to separate these two and make it easier for readers to find it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eiso Kant</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is lasting value diluted by blogs?</title><link>http://eisokant.com/2008/07/25/is-lasting-value-diluted-by-blogs/#comment-995215</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting post Eiso.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that you have to write differently for websites / blogs / forums than you do for essays / books / magazines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Often, writing for the moment is the best way to do it, as it's what the people want to read.&lt;br&gt;sure the posts will still be there, but how many people are going to go back in a years time to re-read something that was only relevant for a brief period of time?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree with you that comments make blogs become more "alive" so to speak.&lt;br&gt;It's always interesting, or at least it is to me, to know what people think about something I've posted, whether it be good or bad criticism.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still, good writing, as you say is timeless. There's absolutely no need for us to be sloppy about what we write. I often write things down on paper before even touching the keyboard.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some good point to take on board&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gadget Nerd</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:24:29 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>